Politics

July 08, 2008

Score one for the Tacoma Tribune…

The Tacoma News Tribune has a great editorial response to the excellent and very depressing article by Scott Shane in last Wednesday's New York Times on the origin of some of the interrogation techniques used on detainees at Guantanamo Bay. The gist of the article is that whether knowingly or unknowingly, the chart of interrogation techniques is based on a 1957 US Air Force report on the effectiveness of Chinese torture during the Korean War. The "Trib" nails it;

"The Chinese didn't invent these techniques. They were perfected by the NKVD – the predecessor of the KGB – in the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution. The NKVD turned torture and the coercion of confessions into a fine art; it mass-produced hundreds of thousands of "enemies of the state" who had done nothing worse than, say, travel abroad or fall into the cross-hairs of a malicious secret accuser.

"The Gestapo as well as the Chinese communists studied the NKVD's practices closely. And somehow – with the benefit of historical amnesia, rationalization and skewed moral compasses – people at high levels of the Bush administration came to view some of these methods of coercion as perfectly legal.

"There is something worse than losing to your enemy: It is becoming your enemy."

July 02, 2008

Military service…

"I said that I am stronger on national security issues because of all the time I spent in the military" – Sen. John McCain to Robin Roberts of ABC, 02 July 2008

I want to make this very clear from the outset. I have tremendous respect for people who have served in the military. In addition to the pride I take in my own service, I can trace my family's military history back to the Revolution War. Operation Desert Storm was the first major US military action in which someone in my family did not serve. I mention this to point out that when I say what I'm about to it comes from someone with a great deal of personal experience.

Being in the military no more makes you a foreign policy expert than lighting fireworks makes you a demolitions expert.

Many of our great presidents have had military experience, Washington, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and while their time in the service no doubt helped shape their views and policies, just having been in the military doesn't grant you special national security powers. My mother was in for 7 years, and my father for 29 and while I loved them both, neither knew much about national security.

I'm sorry Sen. McCain, I respect your service very much, and while being in the military might give you insight into what it means to send young men and women into war (something our current president sorely lacked), it doesn't automatically make you better at national security or foreign affairs.

June 18, 2008

“Full Metal McCain”…

I've really come to enjoy reading Matt Taibbi over at Rolling Stone, but I think he really hits on something here, and it's more than the conversion John McCain is going through (from self styled "maverick" to standard Republican). While I'm a proud Obama supporter I'm not so stupid as to believe that race isn't going to make this contest closer than it probably should be. That Senator Obama isn't white is going to be a factor. It shouldn't be, and it is most assuredly not as big a factor as it would have been even 10 years ago, but it will cost him some votes. Don't believe me? Go read

June 04, 2008

Obama in ’08…

1 – The Republican National Committee is circulating a new video comprised of Senator Clinton's attacks on Barack Obama, in particular her comments about the fact that she and Senator McCain have Commander In Chief qualifications, but Senator Obama doesn't. Thanks HRC!

2 – Speaking of the junior Senator from NYC, I find that I can no longer rationally discuss Sen. Clinton. With that in mind, I am no longer going to do it. She has *officially lost the nomination, so there's no reason to.

3 – If you get a chance, watch Sen. McCain's speech from last night, and then watch Sen. Obama's. I think that's pretty much all the comparison that we need.

4 – I'm predicting Senator McCain's "My friends" line, which he uses way too much, is going to become as annoying to me as President Bush's smirking "heh".

5 – I don't care what beer my President drinks. I don't care whether or not he seems like the kind of guy that goes to Applebee's for the salad bar. I don't want an "everyman" in the White House. The President of the United States of American is arguably the leader of the free world. I want that person to be smarter than me. I want that person to surround themselves with people even smarter than that. This isn't a popularity contest. Besides, we've had a "common guy" as President for the last 8 years, and that hasn't worked out too well…

* - Yes I know that it's not official till the convention in Denver, but I can't see any way that the "supers" would pull their support from Obama.

May 03, 2008

"The Empire Strikes Barack"...

Yes I'm a Barack supporter, but even if I wasn't I think I would still enjoy this -

March 18, 2008

Read the speech…

People a lot more eloquent than I (insert your own joke here) have already said a lot of great things about Mr. Obama's speech, but if you haven't read/heard the whole thing, do yourself a favor and check it out here. Look, it isn't Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address" or King's "I Have A Dream" but it's still a very powerful and moving oration.

March 11, 2008

Campaign irony…

Admittedly I'm an Obama supporter, and I think the so called "3am phone call" ad was horrible, but I'd like to think that even if the tables were turned I'd find this funny.

September 27, 2007

We have a “Bill of Rights”?

Hurray Judge Aiken!

Money quote - "For over 200 years, this nation has adhered to the rule of law — with unparalleled success…A shift to a nation based on extra-constitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill-advised."

July 12, 2007

A brief interruption…

You'll pardon the interruption of "All Cycling All the Time" for this breaking news rant.

Apparently, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is channeling Madam Trelawney – He's concerned that American's aren't jumping sufficiently high enough at the sound of automotive backfire and believes that al-Qaeda my strike soon, because as he says "Summertime seems to be appealing to them…" And what does he base this insightful analysis on? "(A) gut feeling".

Yep, you read that right. The person in charge of securing the United States, responding to national emergencies, and a laundry list of other responsibilities wants us all to worry because he has "a gut feeling". Don't worry that an upcoming National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) is going to report that al-Qaeda has regrouped and is back to pre-9/11 strength. Don't worry that our effective military (both regular and Guard) strength is the lowest it's been since after the civil war. Nope Mr. Chertoff's bunions hurt so he knows trouble's a comin'.

Could we please have some grown-ups in major positions of power?

April 12, 2007

Isn’t that the President’s job?

I don’t frequently post on political topics, there are so many excellent voices on the web ( dKos, Josh Marshall at TPM, and Digby to name just three) that there’s rarely an issue that I don’t think is better covered elsewhere. But on occasion something comes up that I just feel compelled to write about, and so it is with an item in the Washington Post; ( 3 Generals Spurn the Position of War 'Czar'.

The first sentence of the article stopped me right in my tracks ”The White House wants to appoint a high-powered czar to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with authority to issue directions to the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies…”

Now, it’s been a long time since I was in the Navy, but back in the day we had this thing called a Chain Of Command which is exactly what it sounds like; the order in which communication is transferred from the lowest rank all the way up. In boot camp, along with several other things, you had to memorize your personal “Chain” and while the names have changed, the positions haven’t. From your average sailor or Marine, it moves up the chain eventually to…
- The Chairman Of The Joint Chiefs of Staff (military officer)
- Secretary of The Navy (civilian)
- Secretary of Defense (formerly called “Secretary of War” or “War Department”, always civilian)
- President of the USA (also called Commander In Chief, civilian)

You’ll probably notice a couple of things about that list. One of them is that the top three spots belong to civilians. The Framers (of the Constitution) worried about the possibility that the military might decide that since they had the guns they could make the rules, and as such required the military to report to civilian “commanders”. You might also notice that nowhere on that list do you see “War Czar”, which if you’re Mr. Bush, might seem like an oversight. The administration wants to find someone to (Have) authority to issue directions to the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies…, which sounds a lot like the powers that the Commander in Chief.

It appears that Mr. Bush want to outsource the Presidency. If only he had thought of that in 2004…